Be sure to try to remember to respond to and – if ideal – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which concentrate on the nominator won't have an affect on the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Take note that any unsourced and untagged images is going to be deleted just one 7 days when they happen to be uploaded, as described on requirements for fast deletion.
Be aware that any unsourced and untagged images will probably be deleted one 7 days after they are already uploaded, as described on conditions for speedy deletion.
cc-by-sa-all to launch it underneath the multilicense GFDL moreover Resourceful Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or PD-self to launch it into the general public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the total listing of copyright tags you could use.
As an example, When you are uploading a diagram demonstrating the orbits of comets, you include the following code:
File:Acco IMG 0191.JPG has actually been marked as a doable copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free articles—that may be, photographs and other media files that can be used by anybody, for any intent. Regular copyright regulation would not grant these freedoms, and Until pointed out if not, everything you find on the internet is copyrighted and never permitted below.
×”×™ מיכל, ר×יתי ש×ת ×ž× ×˜×¨×ª ערכי×. ×× ×™ ממליצה שתקבלי הרש×ות ×ž× ×˜×¨ ×©× ×•×ª×Ÿ לך ×›×œ×™× ×—×–×§×™× ×™×•×ª×¨ ×œ× ×™×˜×•×¨.
File:Catedralat_Basil_IMG_6798.JPG has become detailed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the Group can talk about no matter whether it ought to be retained or not. We would appreciate it if you might head to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
Be sure to recall more info to reply to and – if suitable – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which give attention to the nominator won't have an affect on the results of the nomination. Thanks!
I wasn't aware about the existance of that page prior to, but i am impressed that somebody just deletes a whole bunch of things devoid of sending a matter or warning to the uploader??? I wasn't knowledgeable about any improve/dialogue on this matter.
Please bear in mind to respond to and – if proper – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which target the nominator will not influence the results of the nomination. Thank you!
GFDL
Should you have not established the media yourself then It's also wise to specify in which you located it, i.e., normally link to the web site in which you received it, and the conditions of use for articles from that webpage. If the written content is often a by-product of a copyrighted get the job done, you must provide the names and a licence of the first authors too.
Make sure you keep in mind to respond to and – if correct – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which deal with the nominator will likely not have an affect on the results of the nomination. Thanks!